Leviathan, social contract in Public Health: about the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2023)

Authors

  • Enrique Fernández Vilas Departamento de Economía Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Granada. Granada, España

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35830/mcya.vi23.490

Keywords:

Social contract, COVID-19, Public health

Abstract

This paper examines the tension between individual rights and collective interests in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, drawing on the theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. It highlights technological progress in the contemporary era, with a focus on biomedicine, molecular genetics, nanotechnology, and cybernetics, and its impact on creating an interconnected and technologically dependent society. The paper explores how these advancements have transformed human life, leading to phenomena such as cultural globalization and new forms of inequality. The text centers on the COVID-19 pandemic, beginning with the initial outbreaks in Wuhan and the global response to the health, economic, and social crisis. It addresses the tension between individual rights and collective interests, analyzing the perspectives of Hobbes and Locke. Hobbes, in Leviathan, proposes a social contract where individuals relinquish rights to ensure collective security, while Locke, in his Second Treatise of Government, advocates for the protection of individual rights and private property. Thus, we explore how these philosophical theories apply to the management of the pandemic. On one hand, restrictive measures reflect the priority of collective security, aligning with Hobbesian vision. On the other hand, approaches that emphasize responsibility and individual rights follow Locke's philosophy. The ethical and political dilemmas arising from balancing collective security with individual rights, especially in the context of crises like COVID-19, are discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bauman, Z. (2023). Organization for Liquid-Modern times? Critical Sociology, 49(6), 923-933. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205231170923 (manuscrito inédito de 2008).

Halegoua, G. (2020). Smart cities. MIT press.

Hobbes, T. (2005). Leviatán, o la materia, forma y poder de una república, eclesiástica y civil. Fondo de Cultura Económica (publicado originalmente en 1651).

Javed, A. R., Shahzad, F., Rehman, S., Zikria, Y. B., Razzak, I., Jalil, Z., & Xu, G. (2022). Future smart cities: Requirements, emerging technologies, applications, challenges, and future aspects. Cities, 129, 103794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103794

Johns Hopkins University (2023). COVID-19 Dashboard. https://n9.cl/gj7w

Locke, J. (2015). Segundo tratado sobre el gobierno. Un ensayo sobre el verdadero origen, alcance y fin del gobierno civil. Gredos (publicado originalmente en 1689).

Qian, M., & Jiang, J. (2022). COVID-19 and social distancing. Journal of Public Health (Berl.) 30, 259–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01321-z

Rousseau, J. J. (2008). Confesiones. Alianza (publicado originalmente en 1781).

Pasquali, M. (2020). ¿Qué países americanos han impuesto restricciones a los vuelos internacionales? Statista. https://n9.cl/quzpx

Powell, J. (2023). Health and Care in the ‘Risk Society’. En J. Powell (ed.). New Perspectives on Health and Social Care (pp. 103-115). Springer.

Tobar, C. A. (2013). Sobre el individualismo liberal: una aproximación a la tensión entre el individuo y la sociedad. Quaestiones Disputatae: Temas en Debate, 6(13), 13-26.

Published

2024-06-27

How to Cite

Fernández Vilas, E. (2024). Leviathan, social contract in Public Health: about the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2023). Milenaria, Ciencia Y Arte, (23), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.35830/mcya.vi23.490

Issue

Section

Artículos